I think there is a danger here. A lot of school systems buy a ciriculum "package" from companies for the kids to do the work on the laptops that they give them. To me, the danger lies in every kid learns the exact sa thing while also all *not* learning whatever is left out. I feel like y are more apt to get a better-rounded education when you have different teachers that don't all think the same way vs. everyone learning to reci exactly the same thing from the same computer package.
I think it's good to have a standardized curriculum so that you know that a student from anywhere (at least within the same country or region) has roughl the same knowledge. But it's good to have a well-rounded curriculum.
That also means that you have a whole bunch of students who don't know
whatever got left out of the standardized curriculum. As someone pointed
out the other day after watching three 20-somethings fail to produce an
answer for "What is 66+34?" -- "these are the people who will be trying to figure out out social security and benefits."
It also explains why a lot of younger people have a complete lack of
historic knowledge.
If every school is using the same books or, in this case, computerized packages, the kids are only going to learn what they want them to learn.
---
þ BgNet 1.0á12 ÷ moe's tavern * 1-502-875-8938 * moetiki.ddns.net:27