! 16-Oct-2019 21:14:10 Invalid file name
16-Oct-2019 21:14:10 Refusing '/mailer/outbound.015/5da6d127.pkt'
! 16-Oct-2019 21:14:10 Invalid file name
 16-Oct-2019 21:14:10 Refusing '/mailer/outbound.015/5da6d127.pkt'
i note that it says "filename"... to me, that does not include theA good note.
path...
 PH> ! 16-Oct-2019 21:14:10 Invalid file name
 PH>  16-Oct-2019 21:14:10 Refusing '/mailer/outbound.015/5da6d127.pkt'
i note that it says "filename"... to me, that does not include the path...
maybe try using another protocol instead of hydra and see if it is a protocolerror?
i note that it says "filename"... to me, that does not include the
path...
A good note.
There is no drive letter. Maybe that is the reason why Argus fails?
> There is no drive letter. Maybe that is the reason why Argus fails?
no drive letter means it comes off the current drive...
paul, has a connection with this system worked in the past or is this thefirst
attempt at connecting between your systems?
paul, has a connection with this system worked in the past or is this
the first attempt at connecting between your systems?
So it has in the past. (I'm the connection Paul is refering to).
This is Argus -> Argus - whats recently changed is the tosser - and
thus the format of the ?LO files. (The packets are still going to the
same path they were previously).
I dont recall what the format was previously (it was Ezycom), but now
that SBBS is tossing the mail, the interpretation of the ?LO files is incorrect by Argus.
(My) Argus is quite happily sending to an upstream SBBS, but fails
when sending to an upstream Argus.
SBBS is configured to toss mail in the outbound C:/mailer/outbound
(I've also tried C:\mailer\outbound - but the format of the ?LO file
is ^C:/mailer/outbound...)
Argus is configured for the outbound has \mailer\outbound (and its installed on C:)
If I drop the "C:" from the SBBS config - argus interprets the
outgoing packet as C:\mailer\outbound/mailer/outbound.015/xxxx.pkt
(and thus is invalid and doesnt send). (The format of the ?LO is ^/mailer/outbound.015/xxxx.pkt)
If I leave the "C:" in the SBBS config - argus happily attempts to transfer the files (it knows about it, reports the size, etc) - and
sends happily to another SBBS - but to another Argus, the remote
refuses. (In this case the remote is Paul). (And in this case the
format of the ?LO file is ^C:/mailer/outbound.015/xxx.pkt)
My work around is to get SBBS to toss the mail into an outbox, and
have that outbox configured in Argus.
I'm not sure who is "at fault"? I would suggest Argus - it shouldnt be sending to the remote the name of the file as /mailer/outbound.015/xxx.pkt right? it should just say here is packet xxx.pkt and the remote saves it with whatever name it wants, in whatever path it is configured?
So it has in the past. (I'm the connection Paul is refering to).
This is Argus -> Argus - whats recently changed is the tosser - and thus the format of the ?LO files. (The packets are still going to the same
path they were previously).
yeah... the problem is that that local path should not be beingtransferred... the remote side has no need to know anything about your local paths...
did you see my other post about using a different protocol than hydra? thefault could be in there... tell your argus to use something other than hydra
FWIW: argus was the first in the "ART" family... then came radius... it isa drop-in replacement and fixes numerous bugs while adding a few features...
replacement for argus and radius...have a fix for this bug... perhaps it would be an idea to try radius and/or taurus, too...
it also fixes bugs and brings even more features...
you don't say what version of argus you are running but a newer one might
I recall the first time I tried it, after a long time - a window popped up with just ?????? as text (I'm guessing it was rendering russion, but since no language is installed, it gets question marks). I had two buttons
I'd be happy to give Tarius a crack - I did know of it, so if you have a ready link please share :) otherwise I'll go a googling...
On 18 Oct 2019 at 11:17a, Deon George pondered and said...
I'd be happy to give Tarius a crack - I did know of it, so if you have a
ready link please share :) otherwise I'll go a googling...
I'm wondering if I should try to shift to this also?
Is it windows software only or something that works on Linux do you know?
do it that way...If I drop the "C:" from the SBBS config - argus interprets the
outgoing packet as C:\mailer\outbound/mailer/outbound.015/xxxx.pkt
(and thus is invalid and doesnt send). (The format of the ?LO is ^/mailer/outbound.015/xxxx.pkt)
yeah... that's a slight bug, IMHO... but we know how it wants things so we
If I leave the "C:" in the SBBS config - argus happily attempts to transfer the files (it knows about it, reports the size, etc) - and
sends happily to another SBBS - but to another Argus, the remote
refuses. (In this case the remote is Paul). (And in this case the
format of the ?LO file is ^C:/mailer/outbound.015/xxx.pkt)
If I leave the "C:" in the SBBS config - argus happily attempts
to transfer the files (it knows about it, reports the size, etc)
- and sends happily to another SBBS - but to another Argus, the
remote refuses. (In this case the remote is Paul). (And in this
case the format of the ?LO file is
^C:/mailer/outbound.015/xxx.pkt)
I hesitated in replying as I no longer use Radius and I haven't checkedSBBS yet. But... if SBBSecho knows about 'file boxes' then so does Radius & Taurus.
I forget what Argus used to do since, for me, that was over 15 years ago. Can/have you tried a file box? (Also, I suggest you avoid Hydra as itnever performed well for me.)
So yes Argus does support fileboxes - and this is a working
workaround.
I just updated to Taurus - and it correctly communicates with the
remote (by not sending the path I guess - the remote Argus accepts my packet).
I havent noticed any issues with Hydra so far - its run for a week or
so and seems to work well...
I havent noticed any issues with Hydra so far - its run for a week or soand
seems to work well...
Sysop: | Rempala |
---|---|
Location: | Richlands, NC |
Users: | 106 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 246:16:23 |
Calls: | 217 |
Files: | 6 |
Messages: | 111,034 |