Janis Kracht wrote to All <=-
"Dear Republicans,
You can't call yourselves "the party of Lincoln" AND wave
the Confederate flag.
Love,
History"
"Dear Republicans,
You can't call yourselves "the party of Lincoln" AND wave
the Confederate flag.
Love,
History"
Dear Democrats,
You can't call yourselves "the party of tolerance" AND
burn/loot/pillage cities in the name of "equality".
Love,
Reality
"...violent interaction comes when the police lose respect for the factthat all people are human beings and deserve to be treated as such -- and that people are not to be shot in the back or stomped on the neck until dead."
You can't call yourselves "the party of Lincoln" AND wave
the Confederate flag.
Janis Kracht wrote to Dan Clough <=-
"Dear Republicans,
You can't call yourselves "the party of Lincoln" AND wave
the Confederate flag.
Love,
History"
Dear Democrats,
You can't call yourselves "the party of tolerance" AND
burn/loot/pillage cities in the name of "equality".
Love,
Reality
I am SO glad that the quote in the FidoGazette quote got to you,
that was it's purpose.
I know overt liberalism is your gimmick, much like "stupid Americans" is Bjorn's, but I really wish you would reconsider turning the 'gazette into political soapbox. You tend to be much nicer when you don't use your gimmick.
I may disagree with what you have to say but understand its your place to say it.
But this is a silly message hobby only a fraction of the world uses anymore. Nobody cares to hear about political stuff here, ever. Its
tired.
Lets suppose we all jump aboard the liberal train... What do you expect to
happen? A bunch of weirdos from some net called "Fidonet" to march to the White House and phyiscally remove the evil Orange Man?
I am SO glad that the quote in the FidoGazette quote got to you,
that was it's purpose.
LOL!
Well, I noticed it, but wouldn't say it "got to me". However, my
quote above CLEARLY bunched your panties, as evidenced by the
hostile and hateful crap you spewed back at me (I've snipped it
for decency).
You're full of shit, just like Sleepy Joe.
I do not expect nor want a reply. Just try to be better than this.
You're full of shit
Are you hoping to silence the FidoGazette editor?
I do not expect nor want a reply. Just try to be better than this.
Just shut up if you have nothing to say.
If you put too much pressure on Mr. Clough's sad brain, nasty stinky farts come out of his mouth and if it gets really inflamed, liquid poo flows out o his nose too. Or is out little Dany just throwing a tantrum again, sweet little Dany... is he throwing a tantrum again ... our Dany ... doo doo doooo
Alan Ianson wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I am SO glad that the quote in the FidoGazette quote got to you,
that was it's purpose.
LOL!
What's so funny?
Well, I noticed it, but wouldn't say it "got to me". However, my
quote above CLEARLY bunched your panties, as evidenced by the
hostile and hateful crap you spewed back at me (I've snipped it
for decency).
I read her reply and didn't see any hatefull crap.
She did call you a liar, probably because you lied.
Are you hoping to silence the FidoGazette editor?
You responding with an illogical loaded question says more about your apparent need to have the viewpoint tinted in your colour than it does about mine.
I'm merely suggesting that it would be nice to have something in Fido
that doesn't have any political content at all. A good editor publishes something everyone can enjoy that doesn't carry an agenda or gimmick
behind it.
If not, and it remains a snowflake leftist lemming soapbox, then so be it.
A real shame because the cooking recipes are good...
What's so funny?
The fact that she thinks her quote "got to me". That wasn't
obvious to you?
I read her reply and didn't see any hatefull crap.
You should read it again.
She did call you a liar, probably because you lied.
Would you mind quoting something I said that was a lie?
Dear Democrats,
You can't call yourselves "the party of tolerance" AND
burn/loot/pillage cities in the name of "equality".
Love,
Reality
You responding with an illogical loaded question says more about your apparent need to have the viewpoint tinted in your colour than it does about mine.
Your post was illogical and loaded. How can my reply not be?
You responding with an illogical loaded question says more about your apparent need to have the viewpoint tinted in your colour than it does about mine.
Your post was illogical and loaded. How can my reply not be?
By carefully studying several issues of the 'gazette to see that some have had politically-charged or baiting remarks in it since November 2016 for
no reason other than to push an agenda. If it was a pro-Trump agenda I would complain the same... although I suspect a total emotional meltdown from several others would beat me to it.
Contrast with Fidonews issues in how surprisingly Felten mostly keeps his gimmicks and anti-American vulgarity to himself and not seeping into something which is considered a searchable piece of history. I have no problem with Janis running a gimmick here, just not in something that
used to be neutral.
I've done my homework on all of this but unfortunately just like "Oli",
you appear to wish to venture into combative insult-territory with me even though I have never insulted you or really ever conversed with you, ever.
By carefully studying several issues of the 'gazette to see that some have had
politically-charged or baiting remarks in it since November 2016 for no reason other than to push an agenda.
Alan Ianson wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I read her reply and didn't see any hatefull crap.
You should read it again.
I did read it.
She did call you a liar, probably because you lied.
Would you mind quoting something I said that was a lie?
You don't know what you said, or you don't understand what you
said?
You wrote..
Dear Democrats,
You can't call yourselves "the party of tolerance" AND
burn/loot/pillage cities in the name of "equality".
Love,
Reality
That comes from some kind of alternate reality, it is a lie.
Alan Ianson wrote to Nick Andre <=-
I'm merely suggesting that it would be nice to have something in Fido
that doesn't have any political content at all. A good editor publishes something everyone can enjoy that doesn't carry an agenda or gimmick behind it.
Politics are everywhere.
Janis's quote of the day was a twitter post about the confederate
flag and those who wave it today. Something to think about today.
Aren't you tired of seeing it everywhere too?
You should read it again.
I did read it.
Apparently not.
You don't think her saying "you are one sick
puppy, liar" ... and ... "but you are not worth my time and
energy" are fairly hateful?
I asked you to quote something that I said that was a lie. Do you have reading comprehension issues?
You wrote..
Dear Democrats,
You can't call yourselves "the party of tolerance" AND
burn/loot/pillage cities in the name of "equality".
Love,
Reality
That comes from some kind of alternate reality, it is a lie.
Again, I'll ask: What specifically in that is a lie? I mean it
isn't that complicated. Let's break it down:
1. Does the Democrat party like to think it is "the party of
tolerance"? Yup. Check.
2. Did Democrats (I'm sure there were some Republicans there too,
but MOSTLY Democrats because they are the ones who support BLM/Antifa/anti-police) burn/loot/pillage all over the country?
Yup. Check.
So........ WHERE'S THE LIE???
As a matter of fact, I'm pretty sure I remember seeing her post
that politics wasn't desired/allowed in this echo. So why does
she post it?
Aren't you tired of seeing it everywhere too?
I don't find the gazette to be politically charged or baiting.
I don't think I've ever said anything combative or insulting to you.
You told me my original response to you was an "illogical and loaded question". Did you consider that to be an insult? It was not meant to be insulting. It was a question.
By carefully studying several issues of the 'gazette to see that some havepolitically-charged or baiting remarks in it since November 2016 for no reason other than to push an agenda.
Yes, and I am going to continue doing what I do because it is the right thi to do.
End of thread.
Janis Kracht wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Aren't you tired of seeing it everywhere too?
No, because I can sleep at night knowing that I do not support
this administration.
Here's an idea... if my politics are getting to you, go to
another echo.. wow, what an idea.
Alan Ianson wrote to Dan Clough <=-
You don't think her saying "you are one sick
puppy, liar" ... and ... "but you are not worth my time and
energy" are fairly hateful?
She replied to you in kind. What did you expect, butterflies and
zebras and moonbeams?
I asked you to quote something that I said that was a lie. Do you have reading comprehension issues?
No I don't. You asked me to quote your lie and I did.
You wrote..
Dear Democrats,
You can't call yourselves "the party of tolerance" AND
burn/loot/pillage cities in the name of "equality".
Love,
Reality
That comes from some kind of alternate reality, it is a lie.
Again, I'll ask: What specifically in that is a lie? I mean it
isn't that complicated. Let's break it down:
1. Does the Democrat party like to think it is "the party of
tolerance"? Yup. Check.
2. Did Democrats (I'm sure there were some Republicans there too,
but MOSTLY Democrats because they are the ones who support BLM/Antifa/anti-police) burn/loot/pillage all over the country?
Yup. Check.
Bzzzt, wrong. That is a lie, in fact it goes somewhat beyond a
simple lie.
So........ WHERE'S THE LIE???
There's that true issue agian.
Alan Ianson wrote to Dan Clough <=-
As a matter of fact, I'm pretty sure I remember seeing her post
that politics wasn't desired/allowed in this echo. So why does
she post it?
I could give you my best guess but why don't you ask her?
Aren't you tired of seeing it everywhere too?
Yes, I do get tired of it but I don't think the Quote of the day
is an issue.
I sometimes agree with what folks say and sometimes
not so much. In either case I just move on.
Janis Kracht wrote to Nick Andre <=-
By carefully studying several issues of the 'gazette to see that some have had
politically-charged or baiting remarks in it since November 2016 for no reason other than to push an agenda.
Yes, and I am going to continue doing what I do because it is the
right thing to do.
Perhaps you should try it for a change rather than 'following'
the lead of a man who puts children in cages?
Wrong again. At the time she posted that hateful stuff, the only thing
I had said was my original post. Nothing personal or hateful in my
original post. So how do you justify your claim right there above that
she "replied in kind"?
That's right, you can't.
Again, I'll ask: What specifically in that is a lie? I mean it
isn't that complicated. Let's break it down:
2. Did Democrats (I'm sure there were some Republicans there too,BLM/Antifa/anti-police) burn/loot/pillage all over the country?
but MOSTLY Democrats because they are the ones who support DC>
Yup. Check.
See? You failed to comprehend or answer the question that was asked.
What *SPECIFICALLY* there is a lie??? Is it #1? Is it #2? You say
"that" is a lie, while referring to multiple objects.
Yes, I do get tired of it but I don't think the Quote of the day
is an issue.
So, a "little bit" is OK,
especially if it's from the side that you agree with?
Alan Ianson wrote to Dan Clough <=-
2. Did Democrats (I'm sure there were some Republicans there too,BLM/Antifa/anti-police) burn/loot/pillage all over the country?
but MOSTLY Democrats because they are the ones who support DC>
Yup. Check.
The Democrats did not burn/loot/pillage as you said. That is a
lie. It's not true. BLM/Antifa/anti-police is not a Democrat
thing. People from all walks of life may, or may not support any
of that.
Alan Ianson wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
Yes, I do get tired of it but I don't think the Quote of the day
is an issue.
So, a "little bit" is OK,
Yes, it's no big deal.
especially if it's from the side that you agree with?
I'm sure Republicans could come up with a thought of the day I
can agree with. If you have a thought of the day you could send
it in and it might get published.
I may or may not agree with it but I would have no problem with
that.
The Democrats did not burn/loot/pillage as you said. That is a
lie. It's not true. BLM/Antifa/anti-police is not a Democrat
thing. People from all walks of life may, or may not support any
of that.
There's the reading comprehension problem again. I even *SAID* above
that there were likely "some" Republicans there, but the *VAST* majority
of BLM/Antifa/anti-police assholes are Democrats.
That's a simple fact, easily verified. Go check it yourself.
For example, find me a page like the one below that is sponsored by the Republicans. This one is put up by the fucking *DNC*!!!: Did you copy
that? The DNC!!!
https://democrats.org/black-lives-matter-organizing-resources/
Case closed. Game over. You lose. Buh-bye Felicia.
Alan Ianson wrote to Dan Clough <=-
There's the reading comprehension problem again. I even *SAID* above
that there were likely "some" Republicans there, but the *VAST* majority
of BLM/Antifa/anti-police assholes are Democrats.
Yes Dan, There are many folks who support, to one degree or
another BLM. Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Socialists and
others.
Regardless, your statement that Democrats burned/looted/pillaged
is still false. It is a lie. The fact you keep repeating it makes
you a liar.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong. Strike three.
By carefully studying several issues of the 'gazette to see that some
have had politically-charged or baiting remarks in it since November
2016 for no reason other than to push an agenda. If it was a pro-
Trump agenda I would complain the same... although I suspect a total emotional meltdown from several others would beat me to it.
I don't find the gazette to be politically charged or baiting.
You might find the odd quote of the day or editorial that has a political flavour but it's not a political rag.
Hopefully both sides of the debate can enjoy Trumpty Dumpty and Dumpty by Lithgow. Click on More Images to look inside Lithgow books for sample
pages. Amazon's Look Inside offers similar previews.
For a 3 minute audio sample of the latter:
https://libro.fm/ashlies
..and enter Lithgow in the search and look for Dumpty
I don't find the gazette to be politically charged or baiting.
You might find the odd quote of the day or editorial that has a political flavour but it's not a political rag.
2021 is looking be a year of many book "flavours" in the Trump arena:
https://bookmanager.com/tbm/?q=h.tviewer&e_def_id=HGhMHHzi5xM
I hope they don't contribute to total emotional meltdown for anyone! LOL
Three in the list can be obtained this year.
Hopefully both sides of the debate can enjoy Trumpty Dumpty and Dumpty by
Lithgow. Click on More Images to look inside Lithgow books for sample pages. Amazon's Look Inside offers similar previews.
For a 3 minute audio sample of the latter:
https://libro.fm/ashlies
..and enter Lithgow in the search and look for Dumpty
Sysop: | Rempala |
---|---|
Location: | Richlands, NC |
Users: | 103 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 165:48:41 |
Calls: | 158 |
Files: | 6 |
Messages: | 110,486 |