• test multiple qwk uploads

    From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to ALL on Sat Feb 20 20:29:00 2021
    rep packet 1

    do not reply

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Brother Rabbit@2:460/256 to Marceline Jones on Sat Feb 20 15:05:53 2021
    rep packet 1

    do not reply

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30


    quoting test


    --- tg BBS v0.6.3
    * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS from Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/1.11 to All on Sat Feb 20 17:32:16 2021
    On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:05:53 +0200 Brother Rabbit wrote:

    rep packet 1

    do not reply

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30


    quoting test



    Hmm..

    'Tommi

    ---
    * Origin: rbb inngate (2:221/1.11)
  • From Brother Rabbit@2:460/256 to Tommi Koivula on Sat Feb 20 23:59:13 2021
    On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:05:53 +0200 Brother Rabbit wrote:

    rep packet 1

    do not reply

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30


    quoting test



    Hmm..

    'Tommi


    It was a fail


    --- tg BBS v0.6.3
    * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS from Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to BROTHER RABBIT on Sun Feb 21 16:40:00 2021
    rep packet 1

    do not reply

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30


    quoting test

    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads for QWK reply packets.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Brother Rabbit@2:460/256 to Marceline Jones on Sun Feb 21 16:53:38 2021
    Hi!

    rep packet 1

    do not reply

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30


    quoting test

    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads for QWK reply packets.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30


    Does it have something to do with the way you quote messages on tg_BBS? Do I have to fix something in the code?

    Heve a nice carrot!

    ... Have You daily sexual life? Hide it proper from Your wife! ;)
    --- tg BBS v0.6.4
    * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS from Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to Marceline Jones on Sun Feb 21 12:49:13 2021
    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: Marceline Jones to BROTHER RABBIT on Sun Feb 21 2021 04:40 pm

    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads for QWK reply packets.

    No one has ever asked for that. What would the rep files be named - .re0, .re1, etc.? Assuming you'd want them imported in order, would .rep come first or last?
    --
    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #57:
    PETSCII = PET Standard Code of Information Interchange (a.k.a. CBM ASCII) Norco, CA WX: 68.7°F, 18.0% humidity, 4 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From August Abolins@2:460/256 to Rob Swindell on Mon Feb 22 01:34:29 2021
    Greets from my Telegram app!

    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: Marceline Jones to BROTHER RABBIT on Sun Feb 21 2021 04:40 pm

    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads for
    QWK reply packets.

    No one has ever asked for that. What would the rep files be named - .re0, .re1, etc.? Assuming you'd want them imported in order, would .rep come first or last?
    --
    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #57:
    PETSCII = PET Standard Code of Information Interchange (a.k.a. CBM ASCII) Norco, CA WX: 68.7°F, 18.0% humidity, 4 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs


    Conversely, multiple qwk downloads from the same bbs are either rejected or prompted to be replaced.

    Qwk seems to be intended to dealt with right after the DL or deleted. No?

    CIAO!

    ... Send $'s to http://paypal.me/ashliesbooks to decode this: [##### ###]
    --- tg BBS v0.6.4
    * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS from Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to August Abolins on Sun Feb 21 14:45:59 2021
    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: August Abolins to Rob Swindell on Mon Feb 22 2021 01:34 am

    Greets from my Telegram app!

    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: Marceline Jones to BROTHER RABBIT on Sun Feb 21 2021 04:40 pm

    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads for
    QWK reply packets.

    No one has ever asked for that. What would the rep files be named - .re0, .re1, etc.? Assuming you'd want them imported in order, would .rep come first or last?

    Conversely, multiple qwk downloads from the same bbs are either rejected or prompted to be replaced.

    That depends on the terminal program (or FTP client) which is downloading the packets.

    Qwk seems to be intended to dealt with right after the DL or deleted. No?

    Normally, yeah. And usually, a QWK packet downloaded immediately after another will contain no new messages.
    --
    digital man

    Rush quote #71:
    He's not concerned with yesterday, he knows constant change is here today Norco, CA WX: 71.8°F, 16.0% humidity, 3 mph NW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.21 to Rob Swindell on Sun Feb 21 19:39:00 2021
    Hello Rob!

    ** On Sunday 21.02.21 - 14:45, you wrote to me:

    Conversely, multiple qwk downloads from the same bbs are
    either rejected or prompted to be replaced.

    That depends on the terminal program (or FTP client) which
    is downloading the packets.

    Terminal FTP just overwrites, doesn't it?
    Zmodem from Netrunner, overwrites.
    Zmodem from Syncterm, prompts for replacement?

    Qwk seems to be intended to dealt with right after the DL or
    deleted. No?

    Normally, yeah. And usually, a QWK packet downloaded
    immediately after another will contain no new messages.

    Absolutley. But my point is that in its inception the QWK
    process probably never anticipated more than a handful of
    downloads per day and only spread far apart long enough for the
    user to deal with a previous packet and be done with it.

    Rush quote #71:
    He's not concerned with yesterday, he knows constant change
    is here today

    I have trouble with that song. New world man can't be one man
    bearing all those characteristics.

    He's noble enough to know what's right
    But weak enough not to choose it
    He's wise enough to win the world
    But fool enough to lose it




    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.49
    * Origin: --> . <-- (1:153/757.21)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to August Abolins on Sun Feb 21 19:05:31 2021
    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: August Abolins to Rob Swindell on Sun Feb 21 2021 07:39 pm

    Hello Rob!

    ** On Sunday 21.02.21 - 14:45, you wrote to me:

    Conversely, multiple qwk downloads from the same bbs are
    either rejected or prompted to be replaced.

    That depends on the terminal program (or FTP client) which
    is downloading the packets.

    Terminal FTP just overwrites, doesn't it?
    Zmodem from Netrunner, overwrites.
    Zmodem from Syncterm, prompts for replacement?

    Qwk seems to be intended to dealt with right after the DL or
    deleted. No?

    Normally, yeah. And usually, a QWK packet downloaded
    immediately after another will contain no new messages.

    Absolutley. But my point is that in its inception the QWK
    process probably never anticipated more than a handful of
    downloads per day and only spread far apart long enough for the
    user to deal with a previous packet and be done with it.

    I guess I'm agreeing with your point.

    Rush quote #71:
    He's not concerned with yesterday, he knows constant change
    is here today

    I have trouble with that song. New world man can't be one man
    bearing all those characteristics.

    He's noble enough to know what's right
    But weak enough not to choose it
    He's wise enough to win the world
    But fool enough to lose it

    Seems Neil was just describing the U.S.A. to me. :-)
    --
    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #71:
    The largest dial-up Synchronet BBS was The Easy Street BBS with 25 nodes/lines. Norco, CA WX: 64.0°F, 19.0% humidity, 8 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Robert Wolfe@1:116/18 to Rob Swindell on Mon Feb 22 18:13:30 2021
    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: Marceline Jones to BROTHER RABBIT on Sun Feb 21 2021 04:40 pm

    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads fo
    QWK reply packets.

    No one has ever asked for that. What would the rep files be named - .re0, .r
    etc.? Assuming you'd want them imported in order, would .rep come first or last?
    --
    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #57:
    PETSCII = PET Standard Code of Information Interchange (a.k.a. CBM ASCII) Norco, CA WX: 68.7°F, 18.0% humidity, 4 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

    Actually, I don't think of ANY BBS software that has that feature in
    it.

    ... Hi. I'll be your tagline for this evening.
    --- Wildcat! v8.0.454.10 (May 26 2020), Editor Mod v2.1
    * Origin: Omicron Theta * Southaven MS * winserver.org (1:116/18)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to ROB SWINDELL on Thu Feb 25 21:33:00 2021
    No one has ever asked for that. What would the rep files be named -
    .re0, .re1, etc.? Assuming you'd want them imported in order, would
    .rep come first or last? --
    digital man

    Well, I want to match QWK filenames with their corresponding REPs (eg. "VERT0001.QWK" and "VERT0001.REP"). That way, I know which replies came from which packet.

    Should it matter how the uploaded files are named ? you could accept any filename and unpack them right ? eg. I could upload "ABC.DEF" and "UVW.XYZ" in one batch and Synchronet could just loop through each one.

    What I found when testing this use case on Vertrauen was the 2nd file in the batch transfer gets aborted.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to BROTHER RABBIT on Thu Feb 25 21:34:00 2021
    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads for
    QWK reply packets. MJ>
    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30

    Does it have something to do with the way you quote messages on
    tg_BBS? Do I have to fix something in the code?
    Heve a nice carrot!

    I currently use Blue Wave as my QWK reader. Whatever it does should be fully compatible with the QWK standard right ?

    What is tg_BBS ?

    Are you the author of the QWK code in Synchronet ?

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Stas Mishchenkov@2:460/5858 to Marceline Jones on Thu Feb 25 21:54:20 2021
    Hi, Marceline!

    25 фев 21 21:34, Marceline Jones -> BROTHER RABBIT:

    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file
    uploads for QWK reply packets. MJ>
    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30

    Does it have something to do with the way you quote messages on
    tg_BBS? Do I have to fix something in the code?
    Heve a nice carrot!

    I currently use Blue Wave as my QWK reader. Whatever it does should be fully compatible with the QWK standard right ?

    I think yes.

    What is tg_BBS ?

    It allows you to read and write messages to Fidoshnye ehi from Telegram. Telegram. For example, using a smartphone or tablet.

    Are you the author of the QWK code in Synchronet ?

    No.

    Have nice nights.
    Stas Mishchenkov.

    --- Люди, вы когда своей головой начнете думать, а не телевизором?
    * Origin: Lame Users Breeding. Simferopol, Crimea. (2:460/5858)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to Marceline Jones on Thu Feb 25 11:54:58 2021
    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: Marceline Jones to ROB SWINDELL on Thu Feb 25 2021 09:33 pm

    No one has ever asked for that. What would the rep files be named - .re0, .re1, etc.? Assuming you'd want them imported in order, would .rep come first or last? --
    digital man

    Well, I want to match QWK filenames with their corresponding REPs (eg. "VERT0001.QWK" and "VERT0001.REP"). That way, I know which replies came from which packet.

    Should it matter how the uploaded files are named ?

    Yes.

    you could accept any
    filename and unpack them right ? eg. I could upload "ABC.DEF" and "UVW.XYZ" in one batch and Synchronet could just loop through each one.

    No. The expected filename would be BBS-ID.REP (normally), but multiple REPs might be named BBS-ID.RE0, .RE1, etc. I'm not sure what your offline reader does. But the BBS-side would want to import them in a deterministic order.

    What I found when testing this use case on Vertrauen was the 2nd file in the batch transfer gets aborted.

    As I would expect.
    --
    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #22:
    DOS = Disk Operating System (as in PC-DOS and MS-DOS)
    Norco, CA WX: 63.9°F, 11.0% humidity, 2 mph SE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Robert Wolfe@1:116/18 to Marceline Jones on Thu Feb 25 17:17:56 2021
    No one has ever asked for that. What would the rep files be named - .re0, .re1, etc.? Assuming you'd want them imported in order, would .rep come first or last? --
    digital man

    Well, I want to match QWK filenames with their corresponding REPs (eg. "VERT0001.QWK" and "VERT0001.REP"). That way, I know which replies came from
    which packet.

    Should it matter how the uploaded files are named ? you could accept any filename and unpack them right ? eg. I could upload "ABC.DEF" and "UVW.XYZ"
    one batch and Synchronet could just loop through each one.

    What I found when testing this use case on Vertrauen was the 2nd file in the
    batch transfer gets aborted.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

    Because that is not the way QWK works. You are trying to break a
    standard and Synchronet does not like that. I can't think of any BBS
    that will let you do that. It sounds like what you are wanting is the
    Blue Wave Door which I believe does something similar for that, but it
    is only available for 2 or 3 BBS types - two of which are Maximus and Telegard.

    ... Anyone got a good TAGLINE for me ?
    --- Wildcat! v8.0.454.10 (May 26 2020), Editor Mod v2.1
    * Origin: Omicron Theta * Southaven MS * winserver.org (1:116/18)
  • From Robert Wolfe@1:116/18 to Marceline Jones on Thu Feb 25 17:18:38 2021
    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads
    QWK reply packets. MJ>
    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30

    Does it have something to do with the way you quote messages on tg_BBS? Do I have to fix something in the code?
    Heve a nice carrot!

    I currently use Blue Wave as my QWK reader. Whatever it does should be fully
    compatible with the QWK standard right ?

    What is tg_BBS ?

    Are you the author of the QWK code in Synchronet ?

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

    Rob Swindell is the author of Synchronet. Synchronet uses the QWK
    standard written by another person/people.

    ... I wanna be a real Tagline when I grow up.
    --- Wildcat! v8.0.454.10 (May 26 2020), Editor Mod v2.1
    * Origin: Omicron Theta * Southaven MS * winserver.org (1:116/18)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/360 to Robert Wolfe on Fri Feb 26 08:05:16 2021
    Robert Wolfe wrote to Rob Swindell <=-

    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: Marceline Jones to BROTHER RABBIT on Sun Feb 21 2021 04:40 pm

    For the record, Synchronet does not accept multiple batch file uploads
    fo

    QWK reply packets.

    No one has ever asked for that. What would the rep files be named - .re0,
    .r

    etc.? Assuming you'd want them imported in order, would .rep come first or last?
    --
    digital man

    Actually, I don't think of ANY BBS software that has that feature in
    it.

    Concord can detect reply packets from uploaded files. I had to check.

    It can toss RBB.REP and RBB.NEW from the same upload session. It can also toss RBB.NEW and RBB.NE1 from the same upload session. Only flaw is that is asks
    for description for RBB.NE1 file. :)

    ======================================================================

    Press (Enter) to start transfer, (A) to abort, (!) to log off after transfer,
    (P) to change transfer protocol.
    Start your transfer now or press <Ctrl-X> over a dozen times to abort.



    Upload Zmodem

    rbb.ne1 (494 chrs, 0:00 min = 494 cps eff)
    rbb.new (494 chrs, 0:00 min = 494 cps eff)



    Checking uploaded file RBB.NE1 ...


    Enter descriptions for files

    RBB.NE1 test

    Tossing message packet to message base...
    Message saved :
    To: All ( Public )
    Subj: test
    Area: FIDOTESTX - Fidonet TEST echo and malfunction conf


    Duplicate message found from message packet. Deleted!

    Press (Enter) to continue.

    ======================================================================

    'Tommi

    ... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader!

    --- Concord/2/BW 1.06 (Reg.)
    * Origin: - rbb - telnet://rbb.homeip.net:32 - (2:221/360)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to ROB SWINDELL on Sun Feb 28 16:42:00 2021
    you could accept any
    filename and unpack them right ? eg. I could upload "ABC.DEF" and "UVW.XYZ" in one batch and Synchronet could just loop through each one.

    No. The expected filename would be BBS-ID.REP (normally), but multiple REPs might be named BBS-ID.RE0, .RE1, etc. I'm not sure what your
    offline reader does. But the BBS-side would want to import them in a deterministic order.

    Why does the order matter ? does the order affect the message dates ? what if the REP packet contains out-of-order replies, or a user manually uploads files that are out of order ?

    For example, I have "VERT.REP.001" and "VERT.REP.002" ... when I upload these files I might decide to rename the 002 to "VERT.REP" and upload it first.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to STAS MISHCHENKOV on Sun Feb 28 16:43:00 2021
    What is tg_BBS ?

    It allows you to read and write messages to Fidoshnye ehi from
    Telegram. Telegram. For example, using a smartphone or tablet.

    Oh ok. I thought it was some BBS software.

    I am sure some people think it is cool to use Fidonet on smart phones and tablets but it is not my style. I prefer to use pre-2000 stuff to get a more authentic experience.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to ROBERT WOLFE on Sun Feb 28 16:44:00 2021
    What I found when testing this use case on Vertrauen was the 2nd file in the
    batch transfer gets aborted.

    Because that is not the way QWK works. You are trying to break a standard and Synchronet does not like that. I can't think of any BBS that will let you do that. It sounds like what you are wanting is the Blue Wave Door which I believe does something similar for that, but it
    is only available for 2 or 3 BBS types - two of which are Maximus and

    I thought QWK was just a file format. So I do not understand why there would be any problem with batch processing QWK reply packets. If a user can manually upload multiple QWK REP files, then why not take multiple files in a single upload ? why would I need a door just to do that.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to ROBERT WOLFE on Sun Feb 28 16:45:00 2021
    compatible with the QWK standard right ?

    What is tg_BBS ?

    Are you the author of the QWK code in Synchronet ?

    Rob Swindell is the author of Synchronet. Synchronet uses the QWK standard written by another person/people.

    That is what I thought.

    But I got confused with tg_BBS perhaps being some kind of weird QWK method name in Synchronet sources.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to Marceline Jones on Sat Feb 27 22:53:09 2021
    Re: test multiple qwk uploads
    By: Marceline Jones to ROB SWINDELL on Sun Feb 28 2021 04:42 pm

    you could accept any
    filename and unpack them right ? eg. I could upload "ABC.DEF" and "UVW.XYZ" in one batch and Synchronet could just loop through each one.

    No. The expected filename would be BBS-ID.REP (normally), but multiple REPs might be named BBS-ID.RE0, .RE1, etc. I'm not sure what your offline reader does. But the BBS-side would want to import them in a deterministic order.

    Why does the order matter ?

    The author of the messages may care. If you don't care the order in which your messages are posted, then cool.
    --
    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #28:
    We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.
    Norco, CA WX: 56.2°F, 31.0% humidity, 0 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Stas Mishchenkov@2:460/5858 to Marceline Jones on Sun Feb 28 12:23:16 2021
    Hi, Marceline!

    28 фев 21 16:43, Marceline Jones -> STAS MISHCHENKOV:

    Oh ok. I thought it was some BBS software.

    This is a rather specific BBS software.

    I am sure some people think it is cool to use Fidonet on smart phones
    and tablets

    It's useful.

    but it is not my style. I prefer to use pre-2000 stuff to
    get a more authentic experience.

    This is your choice. I also use a regular computer for Fido, but sometimes it is convenient to read echo conferences from my phone on the road.

    Have nice nights.
    Stas Mishchenkov.

    --- Всё, что ты хочешь, находится на обратной стороне страха.
    * Origin: Lame Users Breeding. Simferopol, Crimea. (2:460/5858)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to MARCELINE JONES on Sun Feb 28 10:25:00 2021
    For example, I have "VERT.REP.001" and "VERT.REP.002" ... when I upload these les I might decide to rename the 002 to "VERT.REP" and upload it first.

    Why do you have multiple REP files? Most QWK readers will allow you to
    keep appending to the same REP until you are aready to upload it. SLMR and MultiMail both do. When you reopen the/open a new QWK packet, they ask if
    you want to delete the REP. If you say no, the reader will reopen the old
    one and let you keep adding to it.

    The messages all stay in order that way, too.

    I think you are looking for a solution to a problem that doesn't exist?


    * SLMR 2.1a * How do you tell when you're out of invisible ink?
    --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to ROB SWINDELL on Sun Mar 7 17:49:00 2021
    Why does the order matter ?

    The author of the messages may care. If you don't care the order in
    which your messages are posted, then cool. --

    Perhaps a sensible default would be to process files in ascending filename order. This would allow users to upload whatever files they want and obviate the need for strict extensions. If it turns out that messages are being imported with undesired chronology, then the uploader can be reminded to use logically sequenced file names.

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Marceline Jones@1:103/705 to MIKE POWELL on Sun Mar 7 18:05:00 2021
    For example, I have "VERT.REP.001" and "VERT.REP.002" ... when I upload these
    les I might decide to rename the 002 to "VERT.REP" and upload it first.

    Why do you have multiple REP files? Most QWK readers will allow you
    to keep appending to the same REP until you are aready to upload it.

    I want to generate REP files for each QWK file so I know which QWK file contains the original message being replied to.

    SLMR and MultiMail both do. When you reopen the/open a new QWK packet, they ask if you want to delete the REP. If you say no, the reader will reopen the old one and let you keep adding to it.
    The messages all stay in order that way, too.

    I believe QWK readers pack replies in the order that messages are written, and the import is done in the order in which a REP is uploaded combined with the order that individual messages within the REP is packed. So the chronology of messages that Synchronet imports depends entirely on what the end user does.

    I think you are looking for a solution to a problem that doesn't
    exist?

    It is more an inconvenience (than a problem) for my specific use case. Something that I observed in Synchronet and decided to whinge about it. Rob Swindell then said nobody ever asked for that feature, and I more or less said why not ?

    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)