Below is my reply to your message. It's *not encrypted* only signed
(but not clearsigned). Anyone with gpg can decode it and view it's
contents
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
owGbwMvMwMRovbl2hdf0ydqMaxlNk7jS83NSUlP0covT48Qnf/DIVHAsTS8tLtHh
4vLPUzAyMDLQNTDUNbBUMDKyMja3MjDVUajML1UoL8ovSVUoyVfITbXi4lKws1Nw
Below is my reply to your message. It's *not encrypted* only signed
(but not clearsigned). Anyone with gpg can decode it and view it's
contents
[snip]
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
owGbwMvMwMRovbl2hdf0ydqMaxlNk7jS83NSUlP0covT48Qnf/DIVHAsTS8tLtHh
4vLPUzAyMDLQNTDUNbBUMDKyMja3MjDVUajML1UoL8ovSVUoyVfITbXi4lKws1Nw
An "only signed" message produces what still looks encrypted.
Maybe we are being too loose with the terminology.
Maybe we should say, just signing a message *encodes* it.
Maybe we should say, just signing a message *encodes* it.
I'm already trying to do that. "Ascii encoding" is not the same
as "Encrypting"!
Sysop: | Rempala |
---|---|
Location: | Richlands, NC |
Users: | 103 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 72:16:38 |
Calls: | 157 |
Files: | 6 |
Messages: | 110,470 |