Will the reader please bear with Google posting's ugly formatting?
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:15:02 -0600, Mark Hill<mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
That's because this is not a recession.
deep <deep@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:15:02 -0600, Mark Hill <mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
That's because this is not a recession.
deep<deep@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:15:02 -0600, Mark Hill<mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
That's because this is not a recession.
Tell us what it is, Oh Great Economic Wizard!
On 11/3/2012 10:24 AM, deep wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:15:02 -0600, Mark Hill<mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
That's because this is not a recession.
http://online.wsj.com/
Negative $4,019
The Obama years have been brutal on middle-class incomes.
The Presidential race is boiling down to one dominant issue: which
party's policies will do more to help the financially stressed American >middle class. President Obama's campaign theme is that Mitt Romney and
the Republicans cater to the rich, while Mr. Obama cares about
struggling families.
He may care, but he sure hasn't done much for them. New income data from
the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census income specialists at the >nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier Research, reveal that the >three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency have done enormous harm
to middle-class households.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and >shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
Add the authors: "The overall decline since June 2009 was larger than
the 2.6 percent decline that occurred" during the recession from
December 2007 to June 2009. For household income, in other words, the
Obama recovery has been worse than the Bush recession.
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:29:17 -0600, Mark Hill<mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
On 11/3/2012 10:24 AM, deep wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:15:02 -0600, Mark Hill<mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
That's because this is not a recession.
http://online.wsj.com/
Negative $4,019
The Obama years have been brutal on middle-class incomes.
The Presidential race is boiling down to one dominant issue: which
party's policies will do more to help the financially stressed American
middle class. President Obama's campaign theme is that Mitt Romney and
the Republicans cater to the rich, while Mr. Obama cares about
struggling families.
He may care, but he sure hasn't done much for them. New income data from
the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census income specialists at the
nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier Research, reveal that the
three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency have done enormous harm
to middle-class households.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
Add the authors: "The overall decline since June 2009 was larger than
the 2.6 percent decline that occurred" during the recession from
December 2007 to June 2009. For household income, in other words, the
Obama recovery has been worse than the Bush recession.
That's because this is not a recession. This is a continuation of
the Bush Depression.
deep <deep@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:29:17 -0600, Mark Hill <mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
On 11/3/2012 10:24 AM, deep wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:15:02 -0600, Mark Hill<mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
That's because this is not a recession.
http://online.wsj.com/
Negative $4,019
The Obama years have been brutal on middle-class incomes.
The Presidential race is boiling down to one dominant issue: which
party's policies will do more to help the financially stressed American >>middle class. President Obama's campaign theme is that Mitt Romney and
the Republicans cater to the rich, while Mr. Obama cares about
struggling families.
He may care, but he sure hasn't done much for them. New income data from >>the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census income specialists at the >>nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier Research, reveal that the >>three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency have done enormous harm
to middle-class households.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and >>shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household >>income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
Add the authors: "The overall decline since June 2009 was larger than
the 2.6 percent decline that occurred" during the recession from
December 2007 to June 2009. For household income, in other words, the >>Obama recovery has been worse than the Bush recession.
That's because this is not a recession. This is a continuation of
the Bush Depression.
deep <deep@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:29:17 -0600, Mark Hill <mh505@qmail.not> wrote:
On 11/3/2012 10:24 AM, deep wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:15:02 -0600, Mark Hill<mh505@qmail.not> wrote: >>>>
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
That's because this is not a recession.
http://online.wsj.com/
Negative $4,019
The Obama years have been brutal on middle-class incomes.
The Presidential race is boiling down to one dominant issue: which >>>party's policies will do more to help the financially stressed American >>>middle class. President Obama's campaign theme is that Mitt Romney and >>>the Republicans cater to the rich, while Mr. Obama cares about
struggling families.
He may care, but he sure hasn't done much for them. New income data from >>>the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census income specialists at the >>>nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier Research, reveal that the >>>three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency have done enormous harm
to middle-class households.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and >>>shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household >>>income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
Add the authors: "The overall decline since June 2009 was larger than
the 2.6 percent decline that occurred" during the recession from
December 2007 to June 2009. For household income, in other words, the >>>Obama recovery has been worse than the Bush recession.
That's because this is not a recession. This is a continuation of
the Bush Depression.
http://economics.about.com/cs/businesscycles/a/depressions_2.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States
try not to let your bigotry and hate stop you from thinking.
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9mqa98h99b1s0mrtnt97ejur4gt22mcihu@4ax.com...
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1deep <d...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:29:17 -0600, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
On 11/3/2012 10:24 AM, deep wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:15:02 -0600, Mark Hill<mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
That's because this is not a recession.
http://online.wsj.com/
Negative $4,019
The Obama years have been brutal on middle-class incomes.
The Presidential race is boiling down to one dominant issue: which >>>party's policies will do more to help the financially stressed American >>>middle class. President Obama's campaign theme is that Mitt Romney and >>>the Republicans cater to the rich, while Mr. Obama cares about >>>struggling families.
He may care, but he sure hasn't done much for them. New income data from >>>the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census income specialists at the >>>nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier Research, reveal that the >>>three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency have done enormous harm >>>to middle-class households.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and >>>shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household >>>income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted >>>for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real >>>income, a little less than a month's income every year.
Add the authors: "The overall decline since June 2009 was larger than >>>the 2.6 percent decline that occurred" during the recession from >>>December 2007 to June 2009. For household income, in other words, the >>>Obama recovery has been worse than the Bush recession.
That's because this is not a recession. This is a continuation of
the Bush Depression.
http://economics.about.com/cs/businesscycles/a/depressions_2.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States
try not to let your bigotry and hate stop you from thinking.
Has he ever started?
Thinking that is....
BASIC AMERICAN JEWOCRACY AND HOW TO CURE IT
On 11/4/2012 4:51 PM, Hal Womack 3-dan wrote:--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
BASIC AMERICAN JEWOCRACY AND HOW TO CURE IT
SAN FRANCISCO
37.77493, -122.41942
Connection through
INTERNET ARCHIVE
Domain ARCHIVE.ORG
208.70.28.126
1601-1645 San Francisco Bicycle Route 30
San Francisco, CA 9410
At this address:
Arbor
Dermitzakis Leather Co
UA
Union Local 38; Plumbing & Pipe Fitting
On 11/6/2012 5:02 AM, Hal Womack 3-dan wrote:--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
SAN FRANCISCO
37.77493, -122.41942
Connection through
INTERNET ARCHIVE
Domain ARCHIVE.ORG
208.70.28.126
1601-1645 San Francisco Bicycle Route 30
San Francisco, CA 9410
At this address:
Arbor
Dermitzakis Leather Co
UA
Union Local 38; Plumbing & Pipe Fitting
Posting garbage to sabotage the Usenet =
On 11/6/2012 2:37 PM, Hal Womack 3-dan wrote:--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
Posting garbage to sabotage the Usenet =
You're going _down_
SAN FRANCISCO
37.77493, -122.41942
Connection through
INTERNET ARCHIVE
Domain ARCHIVE.ORG
208.70.28.126
1601-1645 San Francisco Bicycle Route 30
San Francisco, CA 9410
At this address:
Arbor
Dermitzakis Leather Co
UA
Union Local 38; Plumbing & Pipe Fitting
Sysop: | Rempala |
---|---|
Location: | Richlands, NC |
Users: | 103 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 159:09:44 |
Calls: | 158 |
Files: | 6 |
Messages: | 110,474 |