X-Received: by 10.224.130.195 with SMTP id u3mr15536255qas.1.1368320726220;
Sat, 11 May 2013 18:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september .org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-septemb er.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!m7no4887164qam.0!news-out.go ogle.com!y6ni33840qax.0!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.g iganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.PO STED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 20:05:25 -0500
From: Gunner Asch <
gunnerasch@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.survivalism,dfw.politics
Subject: Re: Did you notice who Obama Threatened?
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 18:05:24 -0700
Organization: Coyote Engineering
Reply-To: gunnerasch AT gmail.com
Message-ID: <
i3qto816h84h4ctr0t5lfrh1tkgc2fk0ia@4ax.com>
References: <5189340b$
1@news.synserver.de> <kmme9b$ei4$
1@speranza.aioe.org> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 226
X-Usenet-Provider:
http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-2GDy6sugBEncQMFGrQ938wl779vrP3Qh1C3llGwJzmYeBClxCljds1fKkI4pl1VtI426BvuY/3Z kn7T!jJ3c3YHt1k64G5+VnFiHzU2+fl/z1gvSNETKkmbjFv/Ea7xvcQFunlI5xU64daHtv0xdYg== X-Complaints-To:
abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications:
http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 11496
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Xref: news.eternal-september.org misc.survivalism:26673 dfw.politics:391
On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:47:31 -0500, "Jean Tant" <
jtant@flash.net>
wrote:
No illegal aliens receive federal benefits.
Poor Jean Cant...really cant...can she?
Illegal Aliens and Federal Benefits
Author
By Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh (Bio and Archives) Wednesday,
October 24, 2012
| Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
110
Theoretically, the law forbids illegal aliens from receiving benefits
reserved for American citizens with the exception of emergency
Medicaid. In practice, it does not prevent any of them from applying
for and receiving benefits paid for by American taxpayers who
sometimes, are themselves denied benefits.
Emergency Medicaid provided in emergency rooms, although well
intentioned, has been used and abused by illegal aliens as their own
personal physician, resulting in the bankruptcy of many small
hospitals across the nation, particularly in California.
Federal benefits distributed to illegal aliens include: grants,
contracts, loans, professional and commercial licenses, retirement,
welfare, WIC, disability, public housing, college education, Pell
grants, food stamps, tax credits, earned income credits, tax refunds,
and unemployment benefits.
The Census Bureau reports 40 million foreign-born people residing in
the United States. In this category, one-third is estimated to be
illegal aliens. Liberal mainstream media calls them “undocumented
workers,” “in the shadows residents,” or “unauthorized residents.”
According to the Pew Hispanic Center there were 11.2 million
“unauthorized immigrants” in 2010. Their in-house demographer, Jeffrey
Passel, used 2008 Current Population Survey (CPS) to estimate “the
number of persons living in families in which the head of household or
the spouse was an authorized alien,” for a total of 8.8 million
families. Liberals like to redefine illegal aliens with euphemisms
that suit their agenda. Other sources publish much higher numbers of
illegals.
Illegal alien families are likely to have U.S. citizen children or
“anchor babies.” These families are given “mixed status” by the
Congressional Research Service. Passel also estimates that one in
three illegal alien children is poor. This is obvious since illegal
aliens have fled their home countries mostly for economic reasons and
dire poverty.
Liberals lobby Congress to deal with illegal aliens based on
controversies such as demographic issues, how to treat illegal
families that have “anchor babies” who are U.S. citizens, and how
strict identification requirements may hurt Americans who are denied
benefits.
Once a foreign national had crossed the border illegally, they have
committed a crime which is not punished lightly in most countries. In
the U.S. however, progressives demand that illegal aliens have due
process rights, eligibility for federal assistance, educational
opportunities paid by taxpayers, military service opportunities,
employment rights, and pathways to citizenship. No other country in
the world rewards law breaking with citizenship but the United States.
Illegal aliens, a.k.a. “unauthorized residents,” come in three
categories:
Visitors who overstay their nonimmigrant visas
Foreign nationals who enter illegally (“surreptitiously” as
liberals like to say)
Foreign nationals who enter with forged documents
Pregnant foreign nationals who enter illegally in the last month
or trimester of pregnancy in order to deliver “anchor babies” (These
foreigners have spawned organized “anchor baby tourism” in cities like
New York)
According to “jus soli,” codified in the Fourteenth Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution, children of slaves born on U.S. soil are American
citizens. Liberals extended this principle to the children of any
illegal alien who happens to give birth on U.S. soil. Thus a new breed
of families is codified by the Pew Hispanic Center as
“mixed-immigration status families.” However, foreign diplomats’
children who are born on U.S. soil are citizens of their parents’
respective countries and not American citizens.
The Congressional Research Service which produces data for Congress
identified another category of illegal immigrants, “Quasi-legal
migrants.” In certain cases, the Department of Homeland Security
issues temporary employment authorization documents (EADs) to aliens
who are not authorized to reside in the United States. They can,
however, obtain Social Security cards. The CRS identified several
groups in this “quasi-legal” category:
Those with temporary humanitarian relief who have Temporary
Protected Status (TPS)
Asylum seekers with cases pending for at least 180 days
Those awaiting in the U.S. the resolution of legal permanent
residency process (family and fiancées of legal residents)
Tourists, students, and temporary workers who overstayed
nonimmigrant visas with petitions awaiting to adjust status as
employment-based LPRs (legal permanent resident)
The “quasi-legal” groups are often denied approval for legal permanent
resident status. Twenty-five percent of asylum seekers and generally,
80-85% of LPRs petitions are eventually approved.
Special illegal alien immigrant juveniles (under the age of 21 and
unmarried) who were homeless, orphans, or victims of abusive family
situations are eligible for permanent legal residence and become
dependents of the courts. The court grants custody of the child to a
state agency, declares him/her eligible for foster care, and
determines that it is not in the best interest of the child to return
to his/her country of birth. Taxpayers then become de facto supporters
of such children. According to CRS, since 2008, such children exceeded
1,000 each year.
“Permanently residing under the color of law,” (PRUCOL) has been used historically to give benefits to foreign nationals who are known to be
residing in the U.S. yet the government has no plans to deport.
“Quasi-legal” aliens fall in this category of PRUCOL.
Social Services Block Grants and migrant health center services are
offered as limited exceptions within the 1996 welfare act:
Treatment under Medicaid for emergency medical conditions (except
organ transplant)
Short-term emergency disaster relief
Immunizations
Testing and treatment for communicable diseases
Soup kitchens, crisis counseling, short-term shelters
HUD assistance
Although the law clearly states to the contrary, pre-natal care,
treatment, and assistance under Medicaid, CHIP, nutrition programs,
and other benefits are given to illegal aliens, all funded by U.S.
taxpayers.
Title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation ACT (PRWORA) of 1996 (P.L. 104-193) “established
comprehensive restrictions on the eligibility of all noncitizens for means-tested public assistance, with the exceptions for LPRs with a
substantial U.S. work history or military connection.” PRWORA
expressly bars illegal aliens from most state and locally funded
benefits.
The Department of Labor estimated $53.8 billion in unemployment
benefits were paid to illegal aliens in 2002 and IRS paid $4.2 billion
in refundable tax credits in 2010 to illegal aliens. Unemployment
compensation overpayment of 0.51% of total was made to illegal aliens. (Congressional Research Service, “Unauthorized Aliens’ Access to
Federal Benefits: Policy and Issues, Ruth Ellen Wasem, September 17,
2012)
The Food Stamp Program reported that 1.9 million U.S. citizen children
(“anchor babies”) living with illegal alien parents received food
stamps, or 7% of all participants. Medicaid spent $2.5 billion, $2.2
billion on treatment for the uninsured, and $1.9 billion on food
assistance programs, including emergency Medicaid and school lunch
programs. According to Steven Camarota, Director of Research at the
Center for Immigration Studies, “Many of the costs associated with
illegals are due to their American-born children, who are awarded U.S. citizenship at birth…greater efforts at barring illegals from federal
programs will not reduce costs because their citizen children can
continue to access them.” (Steven A. Camarota, The High Cost of Cheap
Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget, Washington, D.C.:
Center for Immigration Studies, August 2004)
At a time when so many Americans are unemployed, underemployed, out of
the labor force, and 47 million Americans are on food stamps because
of the disastrous economic policies pursued by the current
administration, should we continue to spend billions of taxpayer
dollars on illegal aliens who are the responsibility of their own
countries?
Federal employees under Obama are 6.9% of the population. It was 7.2% when >Obama took office, and was never less than 7.1% under 20 years of Regan and >both Bushes.
The Constitution requires that people sent to prison have access to law >books that led to their
imprisonment. A couple of computers with internet access in the common >areas is a permitted
alternative to the typical $1/2 million cost of a printed law library.
"arizonajohn" <driedup@sunnysideup.com> wrote in message >news:5189340b$1@news.synserver.de...
It's incredible that 42% of Americans think that this
unqualified, incompetent, dishonorable, ego-driven fraud is doing a
good job. Take a moment. Admit it to yourself. You know who his
supporters are. They are the people that YOU support -- financially.
Unwarranted name-calling and misinformation -- Obama's approval rating is >51%,
Tsk tsk tsk....even the Huffington Post says you are full of shit
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/11/obama-approval-poll_n_3059796.html
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/01/obamas-approval-rating-on-these-thre e-key-issues-has-tanked/
--
"You guess the truth hurts?
Really?
"Hurt" aint the word.
For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.
Raid® to a cockroach.
Sheriff Brody to a shark
Bush to a Liberal
The truth doesn't just hurt. It's painful, like a red hot poker shoved
up their ass. Like sliding down a hundred foot razor blade using their
dick as a brake.
They HATE the truth."
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
* Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)